热处理工艺对TC18钛合金板材性能和组织的影响

Effects of Heat Treatment Processes on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of TC18 Titanium Alloy Plate

  • 摘要: 本文系统研究了TC18钛合金板材在普通退火与简单双重退火工艺下的组织演变规律及力学性能响应。为分析β转变温度(Tβ≈857℃)对退火工艺影响,普通退火实验设定温度区间为795~875℃(单阶段保温2h空冷),而简单双重退火采用两阶段热处理制度:第一阶段795~875℃保温2h空冷,第二阶段550~650 ℃保温4h炉冷。通过室温拉伸试验与显微组织表征对比分析发现:(1)相较于普通退火,简单双重退火通过二次时效析出强化效应显著提升板材强度,抗拉强度增幅达8%~49%,塑性指标(延伸率)提高至10%;(2)与GJB 3763A推荐的复杂双重退火(含中间缓冷工艺)相比,简单双重退火(省略中间炉冷工艺)虽获得更高强度(Rm>1200MPa),但因缺乏中间炉冷阶段的α相均匀化调控,导致500倍电镜下初生α相尺寸分布离散,β转变基体中次生α片层粗化,造成塑性储备不足;(3)筛选出三组强塑性匹配最佳的工艺参数:795℃/2h(AC)+600℃/4h(FC)、795℃/2h(AC)+650℃/4h(FC)及835℃/2h(AC)+650℃/4h(FC),其强塑积分别达到14707MPa·%、17248MPa·%和13470MPa·%,归因于第一阶段空冷形成的细小β亚稳相,在第二阶段时效为纳米级次生α相的弥散析出提供了高密度形核位点。本研究为TC18钛合金低成本短周期热处理工艺开发提供了理论依据,揭示了退火路径对α/β相协同强韧化的调控机制。

     

    Abstract:   This study systematically investigates the microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of TC18 titanium alloy plate under conventional annealing and simplified double annealing processes. To analyze the influence of the beta transus temperature (Tβ≈ 857°C), conventional annealing was conducted within 795–875°C (single-stage, 2 h holding followed by air cooling (AC)), while simplified double annealing adopted a two-stage process: (1) solution treatment at 795–875°C/2 h/AC and (2) aging treatment at 550–650°C/4 h/furnace cooling (FC). Through room-temperature tensile tests and microstructural characterization, the following conclusions were drawn: (1) Compared with conventional annealing, simplified double annealing significantly enhances strength via secondary aging precipitation strengthening, with ultimate tensile strength increasing by 8%–49% and elongation reaching 10%. (2) Despite achieving higher strength (Rm > 1200 MPa) than the GJB 3763A-recommended complex double annealing (with intermediate slow cooling), simplified double annealing (omitting intermediate furnace cooling) leads to inhomogeneous primary α-phase size distribution (observed at 500× magnification) and coarsened secondary α-lamellae in β-transformed matrix, resulting in insufficient ductility reserves.
      (3) Three optimal parameter sets were identified for balanced strength-ductility performance: 795°C/2 h/AC + 600°C/4 h/FC (strength-ductility product: 14, 707 MPa·%), 795°C/2 h/AC + 650°C/4 h/FC (17, 248 MPa·%), 835°C/2 h/AC + 650°C/4 h/FC (13, 470 MPa·%). This improvement is attributed to the fine β-metastable phase formed during air cooling, which provides high-density nucleation sites for dispersed nano-scale secondary α-phase precipitation during aging. This work establishes a theoretical foundation for developing low-cost, short-cycle heat treatment technologies for TC18 titanium alloy and elucidates the regulatory mechanisms of annealing paths on α/β phase synergistic strengthening and toughening.

     

/

返回文章
返回